Funding the Future

Capital is not just money

Why is infrastructure crumbling, care failing, and democracy under strain?
In this video, I explain two concepts that quietly shape everything around us and help us answer this question. They are capital, and capital maintenance.
Importantly, capital is not just money. It is the accumulated stock of financial, physical, environmental, human, and societal resources that make future well-being possible. When we fail to maintain those resources, societies decay.
In that case, I argue that because modern economics focuses obsessively on financial capital while neglecting the others, including their capital maintenance, we get collapsing services, environmental breakdown, and political anger.
Care, then, is not a sentiment. Care is capital maintenance in action.

You’re not crazy

As the Christmas break ends and reality intrudes, many people feel deeply uncomfortable with the world around them. The news feels alien. Politics feels broken. The economy feels cruel and irrational.
In this video, I explain why that discomfort is not a personal failing; it is a rational response to a world driven by neoliberal madness, authoritarian politics, and moral collapse.
If you think Trump is mad, Farage is dangerous, Labour has failed, financial capitalism is destructive, and empathy still matters — you’re not alone.
Feeling out of step today often means you’re seeing more clearly than those who’ve learned to accept the unacceptable. Change has always come from people prepared to be called “unreasonable”.
This video is about clarity, humanity, and why hope still matters as we move into 2026.

Trump: the greatest threat in 2026

2026 opens in a world more fragile than at any point since 1945.
This video explains why — and why the risk is not personality, but systems.
Donald Trump is accelerating every existing fault line: climate breakdown, democratic erosion, militarisation, forced migration and global instability. Small shocks now cause disproportionate damage, the defining feature of fragile systems.
This is a warning about climate denial, cruelty as policy, weakened diplomacy, and the abandonment of the post-1945 settlement built on cooperation and care. War is a risk, but slow catastrophes may be worse.
The politics of care is no longer optional. It is the only rational response.

Older consumers are rejecting the market

As we move into 2026, a striking contradiction is becoming impossible to ignore.
People over 55 now account for around half of global consumer spending, and yet markets and advertisers largely ignore them.
This video argues that this is not a marketing accident. It is a systemic failure.
Older consumers are not passive, disengaged, or uninterested in the world. Many are still working, caring, volunteering, and politically active. What they reject is churn, planned obsolescence, and financialised capitalism’s obsession with novelty over value.
We want products that last.
We want simplicity, reliability, and trust.
We want markets organised around care, maintenance, and responsibility.
And because those products are not being made, older people are increasingly refusing what is being sold.
This video explores why that matters – and why it points towards the need for a fundamentally different economic model in the years ahead.
 

There are no free markets

Markets are not natural, spontaneous or free. They are legal, institutional and political creations of the state. Without law, money, regulation, wages, accounting standards and trust, markets collapse into monopoly, coercion and extraction.
In this New Year’s Day video, I explain why the neoliberal myth of “free markets” is not just wrong, but actively destructive — and why rebuilding the state, rethinking capital and restoring democratic accountability must define our economic direction for 2026.
Markets are tools. It's up to society to set their purpose.
 

2026 starts here

2025 has been an extraordinary year for this channel. 30 million views. Hundreds of thousands of new subscribers. And, more importantly, a growing appetite for something better than the economics and politics we are offered today.
In this video, I pause to reflect on what we’ve learned—and, crucially, how that shapes what comes next. I explain why an economics of care matters, why poverty and climate breakdown are choices rather than inevitabilities, and how a better understanding of money, tax and the role of the state can change what is politically possible.
I also set out how this channel and the Funding the Future blog will evolve in 2026, including more explanatory material, new short-form content, and ways you can help shape what we do next.
If you want an economy that works for life rather than extraction, this is an invitation to join that journey.

2026: the year politics breaks

2025 was a disastrous year — economically, politically and morally.
But the consequences of that failure are only just beginning to arrive.
In this video, I ask a simple but uncomfortable question: who is going to pay the price in 2026?
Austerity by design is still with us. Fiscal rules are still being used to override human need. Markets are still prioritised over care. And the result is that credibility is draining from politics across the UK and beyond.
I look at who is likely to fall from power — in the UK, in the US, and internationally — and why neoliberal authority is finally collapsing under the weight of its own failures. I also ask whether anyone might emerge with a credible alternative, and what that would require in economic terms.
2026 will not be an easy year. But it may be the year when technocratic politics finally runs out of road.
What do you think? Is 2026 the year when politics is forced to change?
Vote in the poll below and let me know your thoughts in the comments.

The politics of light

Light is often treated as something sentimental at Christmas. That is a mistake.
Light is not decoration. It is understanding, care, energy and life itself.
In this final talk in my Christmas series on light, I draw together the ideas explored over the past few days to argue that light is a public good — one that modern economics routinely ignores. When societies withdraw energy, time and care from people and institutions, decay follows. Austerity is not efficiency. It is the systematic removal of light from systems that need constant maintenance to survive.
I explain why ignorance is dangerous, why confusion benefits power, and why economic myths persist when they are left deliberately in the dark. I also explore how modern capitalism steals light in subtler ways: through long hours, artificial rhythms, permanent urgency, and the denial of rest, daylight and recovery, all of which damage health, wellbeing and social cohesion.
This is not a religious argument. It is a reflection rooted in economics, care and the shared insights of many wisdom traditions that recognise vulnerability, dependence and mutual responsibility. Light appears where people care for one another, and choosing care is choosing light.
This talk asks a simple but urgent question: will we design our economy and our society to keep the lights on, or will we continue to accept neglect, exhaustion and decay as normal?

Who is stealing the light?

Burnout is not a personal failure. It is the result of an economic system that steals time, daylight and energy from our lives.
In this fifth video in my Christmas series on light, I explore the relationship between light, healing and health — and why modern work patterns deny people access to the very conditions they need to recover and thrive.
Light regulates sleep, hormones, mood and immunity. Yet long hours, commuting, shift work and poor housing mean many people barely see daylight at all. Artificial light cannot replace what we lose.
This is not accidental. It is structural. Productivity is prioritised over health, time over care, and people are blamed when they break.
Light is a public good. Time should not be a privilege.
A society that denies people light cannot be surprised when they struggle to heal.

Staying alive is living with light

Everything tends towards decay unless energy is applied. That is not ideology – it is physics.
In this Christmas lecture, I explore light through the lens of entropy and explain why care, maintenance, and public services are not optional extras but survival mechanisms.
Austerity withdraws energy from our systems. Neoliberalism assumes self-maintenance. Both are wrong.
If we want societies to endure, we must invest in care – because entropy never rests.